EIA · EIS · Appropriate Assessment · Monitoring

Environmental impact assessment software and studies

In Italy a state EIA takes a median of 2.7 years, and 21 in 100 end with a negative opinion.

The platform prepares the data of the study: 150+ map layers on your site, field records from the Biodiversa app and a report builder. An expert interprets it and signs: one of our team, or the consultant we support.

  • 2,977projects in the MASE catalogue
  • 632EIAs concluded with a known outcome
  • 35EIA screenings concluded with a known outcome

Measured on 19 October 2026, MASE catalogue

EIA software

What the platform does for whoever prepares an EIA.

The study is generated with the platform and signed by an expert: one of our team when we prepare it, or the consultant who leads the EIA, whom we support and do not replace.

  1. 01

    Data layers on your site

    150+ map layers (satellite, official maps and models), computed on the perimeter of the site. Every map comes with its source, date and legend.

    How the maps are made
  2. 02

    Field data

    The Biodiversa app guides the survey and sends every record, with its photo and position, straight into the report. The expert validates the species.

    In the field with Biodiversa
  3. 03

    Report Builder

    The study starts from an EIA template: maps, indicators and tables from the platform land in their sections, and the expert works out the rest on the same data.

    Who interprets and signs
  4. 04

    The report on this page

    Real pages of an environmental impact study generated with the platform, each marked with what was measured automatically and what the expert worked out.

    Browse the report

EIA in numbers

How long it really takes, and how it ends.

From the "Projects and authorisations" catalogue built on the Environmental Assessments portal of MASE, the Italian Ministry of the Environment. Concluded procedures only: the green bar is the middle half of the cases, the line is the median.

  • Middle half (p25-p75)
  • Median
  • Mean
Unit

EIA

PNIEC-PNRR regime552 concluded

990 days2.7 years760-1,222 · mean 988

Ordinary regime98 concluded

1,087 days3.0 years829-1,375 · mean 1,176

PUA

PNIEC-PNRR regime48 concluded

1,191 days3.3 years1,010-1,383 · mean 1,178

Ordinary regime20 concluded

1,330 days3.6 years1,075-1,590 · mean 1,370

EIA screening

Ordinary regime24 concluded

287 days0.8 years178-400 · mean 302

PNIEC-PNRR regime13 concluded

251 days0.7 years230-294 · mean 252

Source: MASE Environmental Assessments portal, concluded procedures, analysis by XNatura. Measured on 19 October 2026.Procedures still open, often the longest ones, are not counted: the real median is higher.

Outcomes of concluded EIAs

632 procedures with a known outcome

71%
21%
8%
  • Positive with conditions
  • Negative
  • Positive without conditions

Outcomes of EIA screenings

35 procedures with a known outcome

63%
14%
23%
  • Excluded from the EIA
  • Referred to an EIA
  • Other outcomes
  • About 9 months to learn whether an EIA is neededThe median ordinary screening takes 287 days, the PNIEC-PNRR one 251. 63 screenings in 100 end with the project excluded from the EIA.
  • 3.0 years for an ordinary EIAMedian 1,087 days, and one case in four takes longer than 1,375 days. Under the PNIEC-PNRR regime the median is 990 days.
  • 71 EIAs in 100 come with conditionsThey are obligations to meet after the decree, often monitoring ones. More on that below.

Groups with fewer than 10 procedures are not shown.Explore every project

The report, page by page

The EIA, section by section.

The pages are real: they come from an environmental impact study generated with the platform from the EIA template for agrivoltaic plants, ordinary procedure, on a client's real project. The project's name and municipality are blurred in the header. We chose the sections that are complete, without the parts that belong to the proponent. For each section: what the authority asks, how we produce it and how much of it is automatic.

Environmental impact study generated with the platform from the EIA template for agrivoltaic plants, ordinary procedure, a client's real project, name and municipality blurred · 126 pages, PDF not public

How much is automated

  • Measured automatically
  • Worked out by the expert on our data
  • With a specialist partner

29 sections out of 30 measured automatically, 1 worked out by the expert on our data, 0 from the proponent or with a partner. Either way, an expert signs the document.

  1. The study01 / 30

    The site in numbers

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The technical summary that goes with the application: what it describes, on which perimeter, with which data and methods.

    How we produce it

    The platform measures the project perimeter and opens with it: 65.44 hectares, 97.3 per cent agricultural use, 48.7 soil sealing, and the natural cover.

    • Project perimeter
    • Land use
    • Soil sealing

    Interpreted and signed by Team expert, on the platform's data

    The opening page of the study with subject, perimeter, data and method, and the box with the site figures: area, agricultural use, natural cover, sealing.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 3/126
  2. The study02 / 30

    Method and structure of the study

    • Worked out by the expert on our data

    What the authority asks for

    The study follows the points of Annex VII to Part Two of Italian Legislative Decree 152/2006, from the project to monitoring.

    How we produce it

    Chapter 0 says how it is built: data collection, baseline, impact assessment, mitigation and monitoring, and the legal framework.

    • Annex VII
    • Italian Environmental Code

    Interpreted and signed by Team expert

    Chapter 0 of the study: methodology, structure under Annex VII and the four stages of the work, from data to monitoring.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 4/126
  3. The study03 / 30

    Project area and control area

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    Frame the project in its surroundings, with a benchmark for every measured value.

    How we produce it

    On a Sentinel-2 orthophoto, the project perimeter where the site values are measured, inside a control area 5 km wide that serves as comparison.

    • Sentinel-2 orthophoto
    • 5 km control area

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The orthophoto of the project area, farmland and field roads, with the perimeter drawn at the centre of the control area.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 10/126
  4. Protected areas and constraints04 / 30

    Protected areas in the wider context

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The project's relationship with protected areas: which ones are around and how far.

    How we produce it

    The map of protected areas over a wide context area, at the scale where the project is a point at the centre, from Key Biodiversity Areas, the Natura 2000 network and other databases.

    • Key Biodiversity Areas
    • Natura 2000
    • WDPA

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The map of protected areas over the context area, coloured by type, with the project as a point at the centre of the frame.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 13/126
  5. Protected areas and constraints05 / 30

    Important Bird Areas

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The areas that matter for birds, to consider for the effects on birds and migration.

    How we produce it

    The Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas over the same context area, at the same scale as the protected areas, for a direct comparison.

    • IBA
    • Birds

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The map of Important Bird Areas over the context area, with the areas highlighted in blue and the project at the centre.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 15/126
  6. Protected areas and constraints06 / 30

    Natura 2000 sites

    • Measured automatically
    • Worked out by the expert on our data

    What the authority asks for

    Whether Natura 2000 sites are present and an appropriate assessment is needed.

    How we produce it

    The Natura 2000 sites of the context area, from the network's database; the appropriate assessment, if needed, stays with the expert.

    • Natura 2000
    • Appropriate assessment

    Interpreted and signed by Team expert, on the platform's data

    The map of Natura 2000 sites over the context area, in blue, with the project as a point at the centre.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 16/126
  7. Protected areas and constraints07 / 30

    Flood and landslide hazard

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The relationship with the hydrogeological plans: which flood and landslide hazard classes the area falls in.

    How we produce it

    The two ISPRA IdroGEO maps side by side, flood and landslide hazard, with their classes; checking compatibility with the plan stays with the expert.

    • ISPRA IdroGEO
    • Hazard plans
    • Landslides

    Interpreted and signed by Team expert, on the platform's data

    Two maps of the wider area side by side: flood hazard and landslide hazard from the IdroGEO mosaic, with the class legends.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 67/126
  8. Biodiversity08 / 30

    EUNIS habitats

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The vegetation, flora and habitats affected by the project and its surroundings.

    How we produce it

    The EUNIS level 3 habitat map, at 100 metre resolution, over the context area; the botanical survey in the field completes it.

    • EUNIS level 3
    • 100 m

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The EUNIS habitat map over the context area, a colour mosaic by habitat class, with the legend.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 40/126
  9. Biodiversity09 / 30

    European ecosystems

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The ecosystems present and their continuity, including the semi-natural habitats of farmland.

    How we produce it

    The European Environment Agency ecosystem map over the context area, read together with the landscape features that act as connections.

    • EEA
    • Ecosystems

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The European ecosystem map over the context area, with coloured classes and the legend.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 41/126
  10. Biodiversity10 / 30

    Vegetation vigour

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The state of vegetation on the project area before the works.

    How we produce it

    The Sentinel-2 NDVI index over the project area with a 200 metre margin: the baseline to measure, survey after survey, what changes.

    • NDVI
    • Sentinel-2

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The NDVI vegetation vigour map over the project area, from yellow to dark green, with the plot outlines.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 43/126
  11. Biodiversity11 / 30

    Biodiversity intactness

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The state of biodiversity in the area, as the benchmark for the project's effects.

    How we produce it

    The Biodiversity Intactness Index, with the site value at 27.4 per cent on the scale of the surroundings.

    • Biodiversity Intactness Index
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The biodiversity intactness index map over the site's surroundings, with the scale bar and the site value marked.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 99/126
  12. Soil12 / 30

    Land use

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    How much of the area is agricultural, natural or artificial, and how it compares with the context.

    How we produce it

    On the project perimeter 97.3 per cent agricultural and 0.1 artificial, the rest natural and semi-natural; in the comparison area 79.6 agricultural and 6.0 natural per cent. Sources: ESA WorldCover and Corine Land Cover.

    • ESA WorldCover
    • Corine Land Cover
    • Comparison area

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The page with the measured land-use composition, the percentages in the text and the land-use map of the control area.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 49/126
  13. Soil13 / 30

    Soil map

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The soil types affected and their land capability.

    How we produce it

    The soil map of the Harmonized World Soil Database (FAO, IIASA) over the wider area, with the classes present in the legend.

    • HWSD
    • FAO
    • IIASA

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The soil map over the wider area, colour fills by soil class, with the legend and the text on the project's materials.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 21/126
  14. Soil14 / 30

    Soil organic carbon

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    Soil quality and its role as a carbon store, to be preserved during operation.

    How we produce it

    The soil organic carbon content map, with the site value at 144 dg/kg on the scale of the surroundings.

    • Soil Organic Carbon
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The soil organic carbon map over the surroundings, with the project perimeter and the scale bar with the site value.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 55/126
  15. Soil15 / 30

    Terrain slope

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The site's morphology, which matters for stability, runoff and installing the structures.

    How we produce it

    Slope from the 30 metre SRTM model, with the site value at 1.9 per cent: flat land.

    • SRTM 30 m
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The terrain slope map over the surroundings, in shades of green, with the perimeter and the scale bar with the site value.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 58/126
  16. Water16 / 30

    Surface water bodies

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The water bodies near the project and the possible effects on surface water.

    How we produce it

    The surface water bodies around the site, from OpenStreetMap and the marine and coastal databases.

    • OpenStreetMap
    • Water bodies

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The map of surface water bodies around the site on an orthophoto, with the project perimeter.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 60/126
  17. Water17 / 30

    River network

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The river network and the state of water bodies under Part Three of Legislative Decree 152/2006.

    How we produce it

    The network from MERIT Hydro around the site; the ecological and chemical status of water bodies is taken from regional monitoring.

    • MERIT Hydro
    • Ministerial Decree 260/2010

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The river network map around the site, watercourses highlighted in blue, and the text on the state of water bodies.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 61/126
  18. Water18 / 30

    Wetlands

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The wetlands affected, sensitive habitats for flora and fauna.

    How we produce it

    The wetlands around the site from Lehner and Döll; the text also frames the Hydrogeological Plan and its classes.

    • Lehner and Döll
    • Wetlands

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The wetlands map around the site on an orthophoto, with the perimeter, and the text on flood and landslide hazard.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 63/126
  19. Air and climate19 / 30

    Air quality: PM2.5

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    Air quality before the works, to estimate the effects of construction and operation.

    How we produce it

    Fine particulate PM2.5 concentration over the context area, with the site value at 37.2 µg/m³ on the area's scale.

    • PM2.5
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The PM2.5 fine particulate map over the context area, in shades of red, with the scale bar and the site value.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 70/126
  20. Air and climate20 / 30

    Nitrogen dioxide

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The project's air emissions and the background state of pollutants.

    How we produce it

    Nitrogen dioxide from Sentinel-5P around the site; the text notes that a solar plant in operation has no point-source emissions.

    • Sentinel-5P
    • NO2

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The Sentinel-5P nitrogen dioxide map around the site, in colour bands, and the text on emissions in operation.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 71/126
  21. Air and climate21 / 30

    Ozone

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The other background pollutants in the project area.

    How we produce it

    Total ozone column from Sentinel-5P around the site, at the same scale as nitrogen dioxide.

    • Sentinel-5P
    • Ozone

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The Sentinel-5P ozone map around the site, in colour bands from blue to red.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 72/126
  22. Air and climate22 / 30

    Climate: historical series

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The site's climate and its evolution, for the project's vulnerability to climate change.

    How we produce it

    ERA5 climate series at the project point from 1941 to 2025: one band per year, mean annual temperature and precipitation, and their trend.

    • ERA5
    • 1941-2025

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The band diagram of the annual temperature anomaly from 1941 to 2025, from blue to red, and the text on the site's historical series.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 75/126
  23. Air and climate23 / 30

    Land surface temperature

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    Heat islands and the thermal behaviour of surfaces before the project.

    How we produce it

    Land surface temperature from Landsat 8 around the site: the baseline to read the effect of the modules and the grass cover.

    • Landsat 8
    • Surface temperature

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The Landsat 8 land surface temperature map around the site, from blue to red, with the plot outlines.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 78/126
  24. Human system and hazards24 / 30

    Access to cities

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The settlement and infrastructure context the project fits into.

    How we produce it

    Travel time to the nearest city (Oxford MAP, Weiss et al. 2018), with the site value at 17 minutes.

    • Weiss et al. 2018
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The map of travel time to cities around the site, in shades of green, with the scale bar and the site value.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 87/126
  25. Human system and hazards25 / 30

    Noise before the works

    • Measured automatically
    • With a specialist partner

    What the authority asks for

    The noise climate before the project, the basis of the predictive noise impact assessment.

    How we produce it

    The European strategic noise map as the pre-works context, with the site value at 0.12; the predictive assessment is signed by the qualified acoustic technician.

    • Strategic noise map
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Qualified acoustic technician, on the platform's data

    The pre-works noise map around the site on an orthophoto, with the scale bar and the site value.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 90/126
  26. Human system and hazards26 / 30

    Fire risk

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    The project's vulnerability to accidents and disasters, fires included.

    How we produce it

    The fire risk index from ESA WorldCover and Sentinel-2, with the site value at 0.47 on the scale of the surroundings.

    • ESA WorldCover
    • Sentinel-2
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The fire risk index map around the site, from green to red, with the scale bar and the site value.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 94/126
  27. Human system and hazards27 / 30

    Human footprint

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    How much the area has been transformed by people, to read cumulative effects.

    How we produce it

    The Global Human Modification index, with the site value at 0.64 on the scale of the surroundings.

    • Global Human Modification
    • Site value

    Interpreted and signed by Platform

    The human footprint map around the site, in shades of blue, with the scale bar and the site value.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 97/126
  28. Mitigation and monitoring28 / 30

    The environmental monitoring plan

    • Measured automatically
    • Worked out by the expert on our data

    What the authority asks for

    The mitigation measures and a monitoring plan per component, with methods, frequency and duration.

    How we produce it

    The plan table per component: tool, method, frequency and duration before, during and after the works; the green works with native species.

    • Monitoring plan
    • Before, during, after the works

    Interpreted and signed by Team expert, on the platform's data

    The page on the green works and the environmental monitoring plan table per component, with tools, methods and frequencies.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 106/126
  29. Mitigation and monitoring29 / 30

    From before to after: the monitoring stages

    • Measured automatically
    • Worked out by the expert on our data

    What the authority asks for

    Monitoring must compare before, during and after the works on the same indicators.

    How we produce it

    Four components, birds, pollinators, vegetation and habitats, land use, each with its tool, horizon and the indicators that move.

    • Birds
    • Pollinators
    • Land use

    Interpreted and signed by Team expert, on the platform's data

    The four monitoring cards per component and the table running from before to after the works, with the indicators.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 107/126
  30. Mitigation and monitoring30 / 30

    Field sensors and their frequency

    • Measured automatically

    What the authority asks for

    Repeatable monitoring methods, with stated frequencies for each stage.

    How we produce it

    Birdy records birds continuously, Spectrum the pollinators' buzz; for each stage the frequency, twelve months before the works to cover a full cycle, and automatic recognition with sample human validation.

    • Birdy
    • Spectrum
    • Bioacoustics

    Interpreted and signed by Platform, with sample human validation

    The Birdy and Spectrum cards with method and frequencies per stage, and those for the field census and the land-use comparison.
    Real page · EIA generated with the platform · p. 108/126

How the maps are made

From satellite to a finished map with its legend.

Every map in the report is computed on the perimeter of your site, with its source, date and legend.

  1. Satellites and datasets

    Open imagery and data, updated over time.

    • Copernicus Sentinel-2
    • Corine Land Cover
    • Copernicus Climate Data Store
  2. XNatura models

    Land use, MSA, pollinators, temperatures and risks, including under the IPCC climate scenarios.

    • Land use
    • MSA
    • Pollinators
    • SSP2 and SSP5 risks
  3. 150+ layers

    Satellite, official maps and models, computed on the same perimeter of the site.

  4. Finished map

    Map, legend, scale and source laid out for the report, with the caption the authority expects.

    • Legend
    • Source and date
    • Scale

Same area, three layers

Switch the layer, the perimeter stays put.

The three figures come from the example EIA report. Same area, same scale: that is how land use, imperviousness and built-up surface can be compared without redrawing anything.

Layer to show
The surroundings of the site, in a circle, coloured by land use: artificial, agricultural, natural, water and roads, with the legend.
The same surroundings coloured by soil imperviousness: impervious, semi-pervious and pervious, with the legend.
The same surroundings coloured by built-up surface, from very high to low, with the legend.
Figures from the example EIA report, page 14 of the PDF. Analysis by XNatura.
  • Satellite map: MSA (Mean Species Abundance)
    MSA (Mean Species Abundance)
  • Satellite map: Land Use
    Land Use
  • Satellite map: PA Relative Pollinator Abundance
    PA Relative Pollinator Abundance
  • Satellite map: Hydrogeological Risk
    Hydrogeological Risk
  • Satellite map: Aridity
    Aridity
  • Satellite map: Extreme Events
    Extreme Events
  • Satellite map: Natural Habitat Coverage
    Natural Habitat Coverage
  • Satellite map: Land Surface Temperature
    Land Surface Temperature
  • Satellite map: Protected Areas
    Protected Areas
  • Satellite map: Built-Up Surface
    Built-Up Surface

Indicator cards of the XNatura platform, from the site's Satellite maps page. The platform's satellite maps

In the field with Biodiversa

The satellite says where. The surveyor says what is there.

The Biodiversa app guides the surveyor in the field and sends every record, with its photo and position, straight into the report. No sheets to copy out, no photos without coordinates.

What the app does: pick one to see it on the phone

Transects drawn by tapping their vertices on the map, pins with photos and notes, sensor mounts. Offline too: everything syncs when the connection is back.

The coordinator drops the pins from the web and writes what to photograph. In the field the app says how many are left, leads from one to the next and, for cardinal photos, shows which way to point.

Each photo stays tied to its pin and site, with its GPS position: the next campaign shoots again from the same spot.

The model recognises the species from the photo, against a library of over 6,000 species. The expert validates.

From the Report Builder, "Capture with Biodiversa" opens the app already on the site: the photo becomes an observation and shows up in the report.

  1. FieldSurvey with the app
  2. CheckValidated by the expert
  3. DataCensus observations
  4. ReportThe record shows up in the report
A hand frames the white flowers of an umbellifer in a meadow with the Biodiversa app: the screen shows the species recognised.
A plant survey with Biodiversa.
A smartphone with the Biodiversa app framing a purple allium in a flower bed.
Assisted identification in the field.

Discover Biodiversa

The Nature Experts

The platform prepares the data. The expert signs.

An environmental impact study is not an export of maps: someone has to interpret them, take responsibility for every judgement and answer to the authority. A named professional does.

  1. 01PrepareMaps, indicators and tables from the platform
  2. 02InterpretThe expert reads the data on the ground and assesses the impacts
  3. 03SignProfessional responsibility for the document
  • 40+in-house nature, climate and ESG specialists
  • 7disciplines under one roof
  • UNI/PdR 179Italian biodiversity standard, project leader (2025)

Who works on a study

  • Ecologist

    Reads habitats and communities, sets up the surveys, assesses the sensitivity of the site and signs the environmental framework.

  • Botanist

    Flora and vegetation, protected species, pollinators and meadow strips, with verified identifications.

  • Zoologist

    Birds, bats, amphibians and mammals: survey campaigns, bioacoustics, camera traps.

  • Natura 2000 expert

    Habitats and species of the Directive annexes and mitigation measures, in support of the appropriate assessment, site by site.

  • Study coordinator

    The professional who coordinates the document, takes responsibility for it and signs it before the authority.

The team's disciplines

  • Ecology & biodiversityBiologists, zoologists, environmental scientists: baselines, surveys, camera traps, bioacoustics, telemetry.
  • Assessment, reporting & complianceESRS E4, BNG, SBTN, GRI, EIA/SEA, VIncA, BREEAM/LEED. Board- and authority-ready.
  • Agronomy & land useRegenerative agriculture, supply chains, land and vegetation management.
  • Data & remote sensingGIS, satellite analysis, IoT data, predictive models, digital twinning.
  • Climate & riskIPCC scenarios, physical risk, wildfire and water modelling per asset.
  • Strategy & deliveryNature strategy, action plans, green finance, stakeholder engagement, client training.
The XNatura and 3Bee team in front of the greenhouse at the headquarters
The XNatura and 3Bee team in front of the greenhouse at the headquarters. Photo from the Company page.

The XNatura team

After the decree: monitoring

The conditions are the beginning, not the end.

71 EIAs in 100 end with conditions. The monitoring plan turns them into repeatable measurements, year after year, with evidence ready for the authority.

Monitoring phase

Pre-construction

What is measured

  • Baseline of flora, birds and pollinators
  • Starting land use and natural cover
  • Zero point of temperature and hydrology

With which tools

  • Biodiversa surveys on transects and pins
  • Birdy and Spectrum installed for the season
  • Reference satellite maps

What you hand to the authority

  • Signed baseline report
  • Maps with legend and date
  • Protocol and position of the points

Change

What is measured

  • Land use with the plant and with the mitigation, in hectares and percent
  • Change in MSA and pollinators against pre-construction
  • Comparison with the control area

With which tools

  • Project layout and plan uploaded to the site (the developer's KML)
  • Simulation in three states: no plant, plant, plant with mitigation
  • Land use and sealing maps before and after

What you hand to the authority

  • Simulation report: baseline, simulation and change of every indicator
  • Mitigation sized on the change, with species and areas
  • The numeric basis for the impact matrix and the monitoring plan

Construction phase

What is measured

  • Disturbance to birds in the breeding season
  • Changes in cover and bare soil
  • Air quality on the construction site

With which tools

  • Birdy for birdsong, continuously
  • Sintropy Air air sensors
  • Camera traps on wildlife corridors

What you hand to the authority

  • Periodic reports on the thresholds met
  • Prompt notice of any deviation
  • Log of corrective actions

Post-construction

What is measured

  • Recovery of vegetation and meadow strips
  • Pollinators and birds against the baseline
  • Effectiveness of mitigation and compensation

With which tools

  • Spectrum for pollinators
  • Birdy and camera traps, continuously
  • Maps with source and date, compared with the baseline

What you hand to the authority

  • Annual report with year-on-year comparisons
  • Evidence for each condition
  • Data available on the platform

Maps for the period you need

150+ layers, each with its source and date: maps are generated again for the period the authority asks for, from baseline to post-construction.

Monitoring already public on the site

  • 200+projects
  • 12countries on 4 continents
  • 10,000+IoT sensors in the field
  • 150+layers: satellite, official maps and models

Case studies already public on the site. They are field monitoring projects, not outcomes of EIA procedures.Transportation casesEnergy casesThe field sensors

Example reports

See what you receive: real reports, anonymised

Deliverables our experts signed for real clients, with names, places and coordinates removed. Pick one, leave your details and download the PDF straight away.

Your report is ready.

Open it now; a strategist may follow up if it fits a project of yours.

Choose a report

Leave your details and download the PDF

Use your company address: requests from a personal email are handled at info@3bee.com.

* required fields

The voice that guides you through the report

Ask, and the page takes you there.

A voice assistant always within reach, bottom right. Ask it about a section of the report, a figure or who signs what: it answers and brings the page to the right point.

  • It answers about this page: how long an EIA takes, the coverage labels, how we produce each section.
  • It walks you through the document: it scrolls to the section and highlights it while you keep talking.
  • If you want a first analysis of your site on the platform, it prepares it, and you open it on XNatura after signing in.
Try the voice

You can ask, for example

  • Take me to Natura 2000 and protected areas
  • How long does a screening take?
  • What does the section on noise and vibration cover?
  • Who signs the study?
  • I'd like a first analysis of my site on the platform

Contact

An EIA or a screening to prepare?

Tell us about the project, the stage and the deadline. A named strategist replies within 24 working hours.

The example reportsReal reports, anonymised: the simulation of a site for an EIA and the answer to the conditions of an appropriate assessment.Choose and download

30 minutes with the XNatura team

Video call on Google Meet

Would you rather talk it through?

Either way you are speaking with an AI assistant, and the conversation is transcribed. How we handle your data

Tell us about your project

Request sent.

One of our strategists replies within 24 working hours. If you need us sooner, write to info@3bee.com.

Use your company address: requests from a personal email are handled at info@3bee.com.

Sites, sector, standard or deadline: whatever you have.

A reply within 24 hours from a named strategist.

* required fields

FAQ

Frequently asked questions on the EIA

Is XNatura environmental impact assessment software?

It is software and a team. The platform prepares the data of the study: maps of the site from 150+ map layers, field records from the Biodiversa app, and the Report Builder, which lays them out section by section from an EIA template. An expert interprets the data and signs the study: one of our team when we prepare it, or the consultant who leads the EIA, whom we support with the platform and our team, without replacing them.

How long does a state EIA take in Italy?

In the catalogue of the MASE Environmental Assessments portal, the median concluded EIA takes 990 days under the PNIEC-PNRR regime, about 2.7 years, and 1,087 days under the ordinary regime. Only procedures concluded with a start and a decision date are counted: those still open, often the longest, are not.

How many EIAs end with a negative opinion?

Of the 632 EIAs concluded with a known outcome, 21 in 100 were negative, 71 in 100 positive with conditions and 8 in 100 positive without conditions. Measured on 19 October 2026.

How long does an EIA screening take?

The median is 287 days under the ordinary regime and 251 days under the PNIEC-PNRR regime. Of the screenings concluded with a known outcome, 63 in 100 exclude the project from the EIA and 14 in 100 refer it to an EIA.

What do you prepare for an environmental impact study?

The environmental parts of the study: the baseline of the site measured from satellite and in the field (land use, biodiversity, protected areas and nearby Natura 2000 sites, water, climate and risks), the impact assessment, the mitigation and compensation measures and the monitoring plan. Every document is signed by an expert of the team.

Do you also handle the Appropriate Assessment (Natura 2000)?

Yes: we analyse the habitats and species of the Natura 2000 sites near the project and prepare the mitigation measures. Among the example reports you can download is the technical answer to the five conditions of an appropriate assessment for a solar plant.

Where do the numbers on this page come from?

From the "Projects and authorisations" catalogue that XNatura builds on the MASE Environmental Assessments portal and updates every day. Durations and outcomes are measured on concluded procedures, and no statistic is shown for a group of fewer than 10 procedures.

Talk to the voice assistant
Next · XN ImpactAppropriate assessment

Try XNatura on your site

Choose how you prefer. With a new account the first demo is free.