Biodiversity Net Gain · England

Statutory BNG, from the desk baseline to the biodiversity gain plan.

Schedule 7A to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 asks a development in England to leave biodiversity at least 10 per cent above its pre-development value, and the statutory metric applies that to each type of unit. Here you see how the desk baseline and the inputs of the metric are prepared, page by page.

We prepare the baseline and the inputs; a competent person runs the statutory metric tool and the local planning authority approves the plan.

The XNatura AI assistant answers straight away and books the call for you.

From the desk baseline to the end of the 30 years

Five steps to a biodiversity gain plan. We prepare the first.

  1. Desk baseline

    When
    Now
    Who
    XNatura

    Red line, candidate parcels and their sizes, protected sites and priority habitat screening, from the platform's data: the pack on this page.

    The pack below

  2. Survey and metric

    When
    Before applying
    Who
    Competent person

    A UK Habitat Classification survey and the condition sheets, then the statutory metric tool, the only place where biodiversity units are calculated.

    User guide, Principle 1 and Rule 3

  3. Gain plan approved

    When
    Before works
    Who
    Local planning authority

    The local planning authority approves or refuses the biodiversity gain plan within 8 weeks, and development cannot begin before approval.

    Schedule 7A, paragraphs 13 to 15

  4. Completion

    When
    End of works
    Who
    Developer

    The end of the works starts the 30-year maintenance period of the habitats created or enhanced.

    Schedule 7A, paragraph 9

  5. Management and monitoring

    When
    30 years
    Who
    Land manager

    The habitats are managed and monitored under the habitat management and monitoring plan (HMMP), with the reporting schedule agreed for the project.

    GOV.UK, Register a biodiversity gain site

The pack, page by page

From the fact sheet to the sources, with no units.

The pages are real: they come from a pack generated with the platform from a template for the statutory metric, on a real study site at Chippenham, Cambridgeshire, 6 m from Chippenham Fen and Snailwell Poor's Fen SSSI. The development is simulated: no developer, no client, no planning application, no survey. Biodiversity units are calculated with the statutory biodiversity metric tool (Rule 3 of the user guide), so the pack shows none: it prepares the inputs. For each section: what the law or the guidance asks, how the pack shows it and who does it.

Biodiversity Net Gain (England), baseline and biodiversity gain plan inputs, generated with the platform, study site at Chippenham, Cambridgeshire · 25 numbered pages plus the cover, PDF not public

Where each section comes from

  • Measured by the platform
  • Prepared by our team
  • Left to the competent person

8 sections out of 22 measured by the platform, 14 prepared by our team from the law and the guidance. The survey, condition and the metric are left to the competent person; the local planning authority approves the plan.

  1. The pack01 / 22

    The pack's fact sheet

    • Measured by the platform
    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The statutory metric is used only in its calculation tool, today version 1.0.4 with the user guide of June 2026; versions 4.0 or earlier are not accepted (Rule 3; GOV.UK, Statutory biodiversity metric tools and guides).

    How the pack shows it

    One table: the framework, the metric (calculation tool version 1.0.4, user guide June 2026), a red line of 6.88 hectares in East Cambridgeshire District at 52.30159 N, 0.4316 E, an arable field with 95.7 per cent agricultural land cover, Chippenham Fen and Snailwell Poor's Fen SSSI at 6 m. The status row says it: a simulated project, no planning application, no survey, no metric submitted.

    • Schedule 7A
    • Metric tool 1.0.4
    • Simulated project

    Who does it XNatura platform and team

    The first page of the pack: a dark box saying what the document is, and the table with framework, metric, red line, location, coordinates, area, local planning authority, land use, nearest protected site, status and date.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 1/25
  2. The pack02 / 22

    Summary: what the pack does, and what it does not

    • Prepared by our team
    • Measured by the platform

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The biodiversity value attributable to the development must exceed the pre-development value of the on-site habitat by at least 10 per cent (Schedule 7A, paragraph 2), for each type of unit (Rule 2).

    How the pack shows it

    The pack prepares the inputs a competent person needs and does not run the metric. The red line covers 6.88 hectares, 95.7% agricultural, 2.3% natural and 2.0% artificial, 6 m from the SSSI. No exemption applies, so the 10 per cent objective applies to each type of unit; next come the survey, the statutory tool, the gain plan and 30 years of management. A dark box closes the page with Rule 3.

    • Rule 3
    • 10% per unit type
    • Desk baseline

    Who does it Our team, on the platform's data

    The summary page: the paragraphs on the simulated project, the red line, the legal position and what comes next, and a dark box saying that biodiversity units are calculated with the statutory tool and that the document prepares its inputs.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 3/25
  3. The framework03 / 22

    The legal frame and its milestones

    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Development may not begin until a biodiversity gain plan has been submitted to and approved by the planning authority (Schedule 7A, paragraphs 13 to 15); significant on-site enhancements count only if maintained for at least 30 years (paragraph 9).

    How the pack shows it

    Where the duty sits (Schedule 7A, inserted by Schedule 14 of the Environment Act 2021), the objective, the relevant date and the general condition; then the milestones: the metric first published on 29 November 2023, mandatory for major development from 12 February 2024 and for small sites from 2 April 2024, the user guide updated on 2 June 2026, the amendment regulations from 6 August 2026, nationally significant infrastructure projects from 2 November 2026 under separate rules.

    • Schedule 7A
    • Environment Act 2021
    • Milestones

    Who does it Our team, on the statute and the guidance

    The legal frame page: where the duty sits, the objective, the general condition, and the table of the milestones of the statutory framework from November 2023 to November 2026.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 5/25
  4. The framework04 / 22

    What changed on 6 August 2026

    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    From 6 August 2026 sites of 0.2 hectares or below and wholly temporary development permitted for 5 years or less are exempt, and the self-build and custom build exemption no longer applies to new applications (GOV.UK, Biodiversity net gain: exempt developments).

    How the pack shows it

    The Biodiversity Gain Regulations 2026 apply to applications made from 6 August 2026, with section 73 treated separately: a new exemption for sites of 0.2 hectares or below on the red line, one for temporary development permitted for 5 years or less, self-build no longer exempt, and neither new exemption nor de minimis where priority habitat on site is impacted. Exemptions announced but not in force, and the brownfield consultation closed on 10 June 2026, are not applied.

    • Regulations 2026
    • Transitional rules
    • Not in force

    Who does it Our team, on the regulations

    The page on the changes from 6 August 2026: the regulations, the bullet list of the new exemptions, self-build, priority habitat and minor development, and the paragraph on the exemptions not in force.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 6/25
  5. The framework05 / 22

    The exemption check

    • Prepared by our team
    • Measured by the platform
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Exempt are householder applications, de minimis impacts under 25 m² of on-site habitat or 5 m of linear habitat, red lines of 0.2 hectares or below and temporary development; the last three not where priority habitat on site is impacted (GOV.UK, Biodiversity net gain: exempt developments).

    How the pack shows it

    Six exemptions tested against the simulated development: householder, de minimis (25 m² and 5 m), 0.2 ha, temporary (5 years), self-build, priority habitat. With a red line of 6.88 ha none applies, and priority habitat goes to the survey. The Small Sites Metric stops at 1 to 9 dwellings on 1 hectare or less and commercial schemes under 1,000 m², so the statutory metric is the tool to use.

    • Exempt developments
    • Small Sites Metric
    • Not exempt

    Who does it Our team; priority habitat left to the survey

    The exemption check: a table with each exemption, its test, this site and the result, and a box with the result of the check and why the statutory metric is the tool to use.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 7/25
  6. The site06 / 22

    Red line and control area

    • Measured by the platform

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The pre-development value is that of the on-site habitat, measured at the relevant date (Schedule 7A, paragraphs 2 and 5).

    How the pack shows it

    The red line on a Sentinel-2 image, inside the 1 km square control area used as context throughout the pack: an arable field of 6.88 hectares on the western edge of Chippenham village, 95.7% agricultural land cover, with the woodland and fen of Chippenham Fen and Snailwell Poor's Fen beyond its western boundary.

    • Sentinel-2
    • 1 km control area
    • Red line

    Who does it XNatura platform

    The site and context page: the satellite image with the red line inside the square control area, its caption, and the paragraph on the location and land cover.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 8/25
  7. The site07 / 22

    Protected sites within 5 km

    • Measured by the platform

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The Small Sites Metric cannot be used where priority habitat, protected sites or European protected species are involved (GOV.UK, Biodiversity metric: the small sites metric).

    How the pack shows it

    The protected sites of the World Database on Protected Areas (January 2025) within 5 km of the red line, with designation and distance from the boundary: Chippenham Fen and Snailwell Poor's Fen SSSI at 6 m, Fenland at 24 m (Special Area of Conservation UK0014782 in Natural England's data), the Chippenham Fen Ramsar site at 149 m, then Sites of Special Scientific Interest and a Local Nature Reserve between 2.2 and 4.7 km. A map frames them around the red line.

    • WDPA, January 2025
    • SSSI
    • Ramsar

    Who does it XNatura platform

    The table of the protected sites within 5 km of the red line with designation and distance, its source, and the map of the protected areas around the red line with its caption.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 10/25
  8. The site08 / 22

    Priority habitat screening

    • Measured by the platform
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Where priority habitat on site is impacted, the 0.2 hectare, temporary and de minimis exemptions do not apply and the Small Sites Metric cannot be used (GOV.UK, Biodiversity net gain: exempt developments; the small sites metric).

    How the pack shows it

    The platform holds no map of priority habitat, so the screening reads three desk sources: the EUNIS habitat map 2025 (level 3, 100 m, 2018 to 2022) puts 87.5 per cent of the red line in intensive unmixed crops (V11) and 12.5 in a grassland formation; the EEA ecosystem types (2012) 100 per cent arable; the platform's land cover 95.7 per cent agricultural. At 100 m or 10 m none can confirm or exclude priority habitat in field margins: the competent person's survey records it.

    • EUNIS 2025
    • EEA ecosystems 2012
    • To the survey

    Who does it XNatura platform; the survey records it

    The priority habitat screening: the three desk sources with their figures, the EUNIS habitat map around the red line with its legend and caption, and the box with the result of the screening.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 11/25
  9. Baseline inputs09 / 22

    What the metric takes

    • Prepared by our team
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The metric values each habitat parcel by its size, condition, strategic significance and distinctiveness (GOV.UK, What the biodiversity metric is), and the units are calculated only in the statutory tool (Rule 3, Table 2, p.15).

    How the pack shows it

    The chapter opens with the four inputs of each parcel, size, distinctiveness, condition and strategic significance (user guide p.26), and the definition of a habitat parcel (Table 1, p.12): area habitats in hectares, hedgerows and watercourses in kilometres in their own modules. A box states Rule 3: the tool calculates the units and says whether the objective is met (Table 2, p.15). The platform's land cover, down to 10 m with reference year 2025, gives the outline and size of the parcels, not the habitat type (p.27).

    • User guide chapter 4
    • Rule 3
    • Habitat parcels

    Who does it Our team, on the user guide

    The opening of the baseline habitat inputs: the text on size and the three quality components, a box on biodiversity units and Rule 3, and the start of the candidate parcels from the land cover.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 12/25
  10. Baseline inputs10 / 22

    Land cover of the control area

    • Measured by the platform

    What the law or the guidance asks

    A habitat parcel is a linked area of habitat of the same distinctiveness, condition and strategic significance (Table 1, p.12), and a professional survey is required to determine habitat type (p.27).

    How the pack shows it

    The land cover map of the 1 km control area with the red line at its centre and a legend by class, from 35 ha of pastures and 26 of non-irrigated arable land to 21 of forests. The table by main class: the red line is 6.59 ha agricultural (95.7%), 0.16 natural (2.3%) and 0.14 artificial (2.0%), with no water; the control area is 68.1% agricultural and 22.3% natural.

    • Land cover
    • Control area
    • Main classes

    Who does it XNatura platform

    The land cover map of the control area with the red line at the centre and the legend of the classes with their hectares, and the table of the main classes for the red line and the control area.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 13/25
  11. Baseline inputs11 / 22

    Candidate parcels inside the red line

    • Measured by the platform
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Habitat types come from the UK Habitat Classification (Table 1, p.12); distinctiveness follows the habitat type, and condition is assessed with the metric's condition sheets (p.27 and p.28).

    How the pack shows it

    The land cover inside the red line and four candidate parcels drawn from it: P1 non-irrigated arable land, 6.583 ha (Corine Land Cover 2018); P2 a forest strip on the western edge, 0.158 ha, and P3 an artificial surface at the north-eastern corner, 0.136 ha (Dynamic World 2025); P4 pasture, 0.011 ha. Total 6.888 ha. For each, habitat type goes to the UKHab survey, distinctiveness to the tool, condition to the condition sheet.

    • Four candidate parcels
    • UKHab survey
    • Condition sheet

    Who does it XNatura platform; habitat type and condition by the survey

    The land cover map inside the red line with its legend, and the table of the candidate baseline parcels with land cover class, source and area, their habitat type, distinctiveness and condition left to the UKHab survey, the tool and the condition sheet.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 14/25
  12. Baseline inputs12 / 22

    How each input is filled, and distinctiveness

    • Prepared by our team
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Distinctiveness scores: very high 8, high 6, medium 4, low 2, very low 1 in the hedgerow module and 0 in the area module (Table 5, p.27).

    How the pack shows it

    Input by input: habitat type from the UK Habitat Classification survey; distinctiveness set by the tool from the habitat type (p.27); condition from the survey with the condition sheets (p.28); strategic significance low, score 1, once a Local Nature Recovery Strategy is published (p.29); hedgerows not measured by the platform; 0.0 hectares of water, any ditch to the watercourse module (p.9). Then Table 5, scores from 8 to 0, which the tool applies: the products of size and scores are the tool's, not the pack's.

    • Table 5
    • Set by the tool
    • Hedgerows and watercourses

    Who does it Our team, on the user guide; values by the competent person and the tool

    The page on how each input is filled, habitat type, distinctiveness, condition, strategic significance, hedgerows and watercourses, and Table 5 with the distinctiveness categories and their scores.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 15/25
  13. Baseline inputs13 / 22

    Condition and strategic significance

    • Prepared by our team
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Condition scores: good 3, fairly good 2.5, moderate 2, fairly poor 1.5, poor 1, condition assessment N/A 1, N/A other 0 (Table 6, p.28). Strategic significance: high 1.15 only where parcel and intervention match a mapped measure of the published strategy, medium 1.10 cannot be applied, low 1 (Table 7, pp.29 to 30).

    How the pack shows it

    Table 6 gives the condition scores from 3 to 0, the intermediate categories at most one step from a condition sheet result. Table 7 gives strategic significance where a Local Nature Recovery Strategy is published: 1.15 post-development only, where the parcel is mapped in the Local Habitat Map for a measure of the strategy; 1.10 cannot be applied; 1 otherwise, always the baseline value.

    • Table 6
    • Table 7
    • Local Nature Recovery Strategy

    Who does it Our team, on the user guide; condition by the competent person

    Table 6 with the condition categories and their scores, and Table 7 with the strategic significance categories, their scores and when each applies.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 16/25
  14. Baseline inputs14 / 22

    Imagery record and the relevant date

    • Measured by the platform
    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The pre-development value is measured at the relevant date, the application date unless an earlier one is agreed (Schedule 7A, paragraph 5); where habitat has been degraded, data records and imagery can inform the earlier baseline (p.58).

    How the pack shows it

    The platform keeps the Sentinel-2 vegetation index of the field image by image, next to its land cover: the latest NDVI is 0.542 for the red line and 0.59 for the control area, and the monthly series of the red line, from January to December, rises and falls with the crop cycle.

    • Schedule 7A, paragraph 5
    • Sentinel-2 NDVI
    • Monthly series

    Who does it XNatura platform, read by our team

    The page on the imagery record and the relevant date: the text, a box with the latest NDVI of the red line and of the control area, and the chart of the monthly NDVI of the red line from January to December.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 17/25
  15. The objective15 / 22

    The 10% objective for each unit type

    • Prepared by our team
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Area habitat, hedgerow and watercourse units each need their own net gain of at least 10 per cent, and must not be summed, traded or converted between types (Rule 2, Table 2, p.15); trading rules set minimum replacements by distinctiveness, up to the point of no net loss (Rule 1, Table 3, pp.16 to 17).

    How the pack shows it

    Three unit types, each in its own module, area habitats in hectares, hedgerows and watercourses in kilometres, each with an objective of at least 10% net gain: one overall percentage is not enough. Table 3 summarises the trading rules by baseline distinctiveness. The tool's headline results show, for each unit type, the target, the baseline units, the units required and the deficit (pp.17 and 24): the gain plan carries those figures, the pack leaves them to the tool.

    • Rule 2
    • Rule 1
    • Each type of unit

    Who does it Our team; the tool reports the result

    The page on the 10% objective: the text on the three unit types and Rule 2, the table of unit types and their objective, the trading rules and Table 3 by baseline distinctiveness, and what the tool reports.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 18/25
  16. Delivery16 / 22

    Delivery options and the register

    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Gains come on-site first, then from off-site units, and from statutory credits only as a last resort; off-site gains must be recorded on the biodiversity gain sites register run by Natural England (GOV.UK, Understanding biodiversity net gain; Register a biodiversity gain site).

    How the pack shows it

    Three cards in order: on-site, where significant enhancements count only if maintained for at least 30 years after completion; off-site units recorded on the register, distant land reduced by the spatial risk multiplier; statutory credits as the last resort, two for each unit missing. Then what registering an off-site gain site takes: a legal agreement securing the land for 30 years (section 106 or conservation covenant), the metric calculation, the HMMP, a local land charge search and a fee of £639; Natural England aims to respond within 6 weeks.

    • Hierarchy
    • Gain sites register
    • Natural England

    Who does it Our team, on the GOV.UK guidance

    The page on delivery options: three cards for on-site, off-site units and statutory credits, each with its source, and the table of the requirements for registering an off-site gain site.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 19/25
  17. Delivery17 / 22

    Spatial risk and statutory credits

    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Off-site land is weighted by the spatial risk multiplier, 1.0 within the local planning authority or National Character Area, 0.75 neighbouring, 0.5 outside (Table 9, p.39); statutory credits are priced per tier and 2 credits are needed for each unit missing (GOV.UK, Statutory biodiversity credit prices).

    How the pack shows it

    Table 9 with the multiplier, 1.0, 0.75 and 0.5, for the area and hedgerow modules and by catchment for watercourses, the impact site in East Cambridgeshire District. Then the credit prices of the page updated 2 June 2026: A1 £42,000, A2 £48,000, A3 £66,000, A4 £125,000, A5 £650,000, hedgerow £44,000, watercourse £230,000, reviewed every 6 months with at least 10 weeks' notice. The multiplier of 2 credits per unit missing is not in the prices: the tool's Credits Summary applies it (pp.24 to 25).

    • Table 9
    • Credit prices
    • Reviewed every 6 months

    Who does it Our team, on the GOV.UK guidance and the user guide

    The page on spatial risk and statutory credits: Table 9 with the spatial risk multiplier, the table of the statutory credit prices by tier, its source and the paragraph on two credits per unit.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 20/25
  18. Plan and monitoring18 / 22

    30-year maintenance and the HMMP

    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    Habitats created or enhanced must be maintained for at least 30 years from completion, under a legal agreement; the habitat management and monitoring plan (HMMP) describes how, and Natural England publishes templates (GOV.UK, Understanding biodiversity net gain; Schedule 7A, paragraph 9).

    How the pack shows it

    The HMMP over the 30 years, and the table from the desk baseline to the end of the 30 years: the desk baseline now, done for the study site; survey and metric before applying, by the competent person; the gain plan approved before works, by the local planning authority within 8 weeks; completion, which starts the 30-year period; management and monitoring by the land manager. The pack proposes the monitoring evidence and leaves the reporting schedule to the HMMP.

    • Schedule 7A, paragraph 9
    • HMMP
    • Five steps

    Who does it Our team; the land manager over the 30 years

    The page on 30-year maintenance and the HMMP: the text and the table from the desk baseline to the end of the 30 years, with when, what happens and who, this document's step marked apart from the ones after it.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 21/25
  19. Plan and monitoring19 / 22

    The biodiversity gain plan

    • Prepared by our team
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The biodiversity gain plan goes to the local planning authority, which must approve or refuse it within 8 weeks; it carries the metric calculation, pre- and post-development plans, register references, proof of credits and how significant on-site gains are managed and monitored (Schedule 7A, paragraph 15; GOV.UK, Submit a biodiversity gain plan).

    How the pack shows it

    Who approves: the local planning authority within 8 weeks, the Secretary of State for nationally significant infrastructure projects, here the authority for East Cambridgeshire District. Then a table of the plan's contents, who prepares each and what this pack provides: parcel outlines, sizes, score tables and screening for the metric; red line, land cover map and satellite image for the habitat plans; register requirements and the spatial risk table; current prices and the two-credits rule; monitoring evidence from the platform.

    • Schedule 7A, paragraph 15
    • Plan contents
    • Local planning authority

    Who does it Developer with the competent person; the local planning authority decides

    The page on the biodiversity gain plan: who approves it and in how long, and the table of the plan's contents with who prepares each and the input this pack provides.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 22/25
  20. Plan and monitoring20 / 22

    Who does what

    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The metric assessment should be completed by a competent person (Principle 1, p.21), with competence aligned with BS 8683:2021 (p.9); the metric is not a substitute for expert ecological advice (Principle 4, p.21).

    How the pack shows it

    The tasks with who does them and the reference: the desk baseline by the platform; habitat type, condition, the units and the 10% check by the competent person; river condition by a qualified assessor; the gain plan and the HMMP by the developer with the competent person; approval by the local planning authority within 8 weeks; off-site registration by Natural England. A box says what XNatura does not do: survey habitats, assess condition, run or sign the metric, approve the plan, register gain sites, or state that the objective is met.

    • Principle 1
    • Principle 4
    • What XNatura does not do

    Who does it Our team, on the user guide

    The page on who does what: the competent person and expert advice, the table of tasks, who and reference, and the box on what XNatura does not do.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 23/25
  21. Plan and monitoring21 / 22

    Monitoring with the platform

    • Measured by the platform
    • Left to the competent person

    What the law or the guidance asks

    The HMMP describes how the habitats are managed and monitored over the 30 years (GOV.UK, Register a biodiversity gain site; Submit a biodiversity gain plan).

    How the pack shows it

    What the HMMP needs over 30 years and the evidence the platform supplies: land cover and satellite imagery for the extent of the parcels, the Sentinel-2 NDVI series for vegetation, the competent person's condition sheets with geotagged photographs, bioacoustic sensors and camera traps for use by wildlife, geotagged field records for management. The NDVI map of the control area, image of 31 October 2025, ranges from 0.08 to 0.92. The platform supports the competent person's condition assessments and does not replace them.

    • HMMP evidence
    • Sentinel-2 NDVI
    • Sensors and camera traps

    Who does it XNatura platform; condition by the competent person

    The page on monitoring with the platform: the table of what is checked, the evidence from the platform and its use in the HMMP, the NDVI map of the control area with the red line, and the paragraph on data management.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 24/25
  22. Method22 / 22

    Method, sources and limits

    • Prepared by our team

    What the law or the guidance asks

    A professional survey is required to determine habitat type (p.27), and biodiversity units are calculated only in the statutory tool (Rule 3, p.15).

    How the pack shows it

    Measured data set apart from assumptions, and the limits: land cover classes are not UK Habitat Classification types, satellite data cannot set habitat type, distinctiveness or condition, hedgerows and watercourses are not measured, the protected sites are those of the WDPA extract of January 2025, credit prices are reviewed every 6 months. Then the sources, from Schedule 7A and the user guide of June 2026 (tool version 1.0.4) to the GOV.UK guidance, the Defra blog of 14 July 2026 and the datasets.

    • Measured
    • Simulated
    • Limits
    • Sources

    Who does it Our team

    The page Method, sources and limits with the measured data, what is simulated, the limits and Rule 3, and the list of sources from the legislation and the user guide to the datasets.
    Real page · simulated project on a study site · p. 25/25

How the desk baseline is drawn

Parcels and sizes from the land cover. Habitat type from the survey.

The platform measures the red line and its 1 km control area: land cover by class with the hectares of each, protected sites with their distance, the vegetation index image by image. It gives the competent person a starting outline of the parcels and their size, which the survey then confirms or redraws.

  1. Satellites and datasets

    Open imagery and maps, updated over time.

    • Copernicus Sentinel-2
    • Corine Land Cover
    • Dynamic World
    • ESA WorldCover
  2. One class per pixel

    The platform's land cover combines ten sources, with pixels down to 10 metres.

    • 10 m pixel
    • Reference year 2025
  3. 4 candidate parcels

    Drawn from the land cover of the red line, each with its size to the nearest 0.001 ha.

  4. The competent person's survey

    A UK Habitat Classification survey and the condition sheets give habitat type and condition; the statutory tool turns the inputs into units.

    • UKHab
    • Condition sheets
    • Rule 3

Same area, two layers

Switch the layer, the red line stays put.

The two maps come from the pack above, pages 13 and 24, cropped to the same scale: the 1 km control area with the red line shaded at its centre. Land cover gives classes and hectares; the vegetation index records the field image by image, as monitoring evidence.

Layer to show
The 1 km control area seen from satellite and coloured by land cover: arable fields and pastures, woodland to the south and west, the village of Chippenham in red to the north-east, with the red line shaded at the centre.
The same area coloured by vegetation index on 31 October 2025: green where vegetation is dense, red on fields without crop cover, with the same red line at the centre.
Maps from the pack, pages 13 and 24, cropped to the same scale. Analysis by XNatura.
  • Satellite map: Land Use
    Land Use
  • Satellite map: Natural Habitat Coverage
    Natural Habitat Coverage
  • Satellite map: Impervious Land Ratio
    Impervious Land Ratio
  • Satellite map: Built-Up Surface
    Built-Up Surface
  • Satellite map: Water Coverage
    Water Coverage
  • Satellite map: Protected Areas
    Protected Areas
  • Satellite map: Observations
    Observations

Indicator cards of the XNatura platform, from the site's Satellite maps page. The platform's satellite maps

In the field with Biodiversa

The satellite gives the parcels. The field gives the evidence.

Over the 30 years the HMMP needs evidence that the habitats exist, develop and are managed as planned. Field records are made with the Biodiversa app: every observation with its species, position and photo, straight into the platform, next to the competent person's condition sheets.

What the app does: pick one to see it on the phone

Transects drawn by tapping their vertices on the map, pins with photos and notes, sensor mounts. Offline too: everything syncs when the connection is back.

The coordinator drops the pins from the web and writes what to photograph. In the field the app says how many are left, leads from one to the next and, for cardinal photos, shows which way to point.

Each photo stays tied to its pin and site, with its GPS position: the next campaign shoots again from the same spot.

The model recognises the species from the photo, against a library of over 6,000 species. The expert validates.

From the Report Builder, "Capture with Biodiversa" opens the app already on the site: the photo becomes an observation and shows up in the report.

  1. FieldSurvey with the app
  2. CheckValidated by the expert
  3. DataCensus observations
  4. ReportThe record shows up in the report
A hand frames the white flowers of an umbellifer in a meadow with the Biodiversa app: the screen shows the species recognised.
A plant survey with Biodiversa.
A smartphone with the Biodiversa app framing a purple allium in a flower bed.
Assisted identification in the field.

Discover Biodiversa

Bioacoustic sensors and camera traps

On the habitats created or enhanced they record use by wildlife, continuously and without disturbance: supporting evidence for the HMMP, which the platform keeps with date, author and method.

The pack, p. 24: supporting evidence of habitat use

The Nature Experts

We prepare the inputs. The competent person runs the metric.

The metric assessment should be completed by a competent person (Principle 1 of the user guide), and the metric is not a substitute for expert ecological advice (Principle 4). Our Nature Experts prepare the desk baseline, the inputs and the monitoring evidence for the competent person the developer hires.

  1. 01PrepareRed line, parcels, sizes, protected sites and screening from the platform
  2. 02ExplainThe framework, the exemptions, the objective and delivery, each with its source
  3. 03MonitorRepeatable evidence for the HMMP over the 30 years
  • 40+in-house nature, climate and ESG specialists
  • 7disciplines under one roof
  • 10years of track record

Who works on a biodiversity gain plan

  • Our team

    Prepares the desk baseline and the metric inputs on the platform's data, and the monitoring evidence. It does not survey, run or sign the metric.

  • Competent person

    Surveys the habitats with the UK Habitat Classification, assesses condition with the condition sheets and runs the statutory metric tool.

  • Developer

    Submits the biodiversity gain plan and the HMMP, with a legal agreement that sets who is responsible over the 30 years.

  • Local planning authority

    Approves or refuses the biodiversity gain plan within 8 weeks; development cannot begin before approval.

  • Natural England

    Runs the biodiversity gain sites register, where off-site gains are recorded.

The team's disciplines

  • Ecology & biodiversityBiologists, zoologists, environmental scientists: baselines, surveys, camera traps, bioacoustics, telemetry.
  • Assessment, reporting & complianceESRS E4, BNG, SBTN, GRI, EIA/SEA, VIncA, BREEAM/LEED. Board- and authority-ready.
  • Agronomy & land useRegenerative agriculture, supply chains, land and vegetation management.
  • Data & remote sensingGIS, satellite analysis, IoT data, predictive models, digital twinning.
  • Climate & riskIPCC scenarios, physical risk, wildfire and water modelling per asset.
  • Strategy & deliveryNature strategy, action plans, green finance, stakeholder engagement, client training.
The XNatura and 3Bee team in front of the greenhouse at the headquarters
The XNatura and 3Bee team in front of the greenhouse at the headquarters. Photo from the Company page.

The XNatura team

Delivery

On-site first, off-site next, statutory credits last.

Gains are delivered in this order. From 6 August 2026 small, non-exempt developments may consider on-site and off-site gains at the same time.

  1. On-site

    Habitat created or enhanced inside the red line. Significant on-site enhancements count only if maintained for at least 30 years after completion, secured by a planning condition, a planning obligation or a conservation covenant.

    Schedule 7A, paragraph 9

  2. Off-site units

    Units bought or created on other land and recorded on the biodiversity gain sites register run by Natural England. Registration needs a legal agreement securing the land for 30 years, the metric calculation, the HMMP and a local land charge search; the fee is £639, and Natural England aims to respond within 6 weeks. Distant land counts less: the spatial risk multiplier is 1.0 within the local planning authority or National Character Area, 0.75 neighbouring, 0.5 outside.

    GOV.UK, Register a biodiversity gain site; user guide, Table 9, p.39

  3. Statutory credits

    The last resort, bought only when on-site and off-site gains cannot meet the requirement. Two credits are needed for each unit missing, and the prices below do not include that multiplier.

    GOV.UK, Statutory biodiversity credit prices

Statutory biodiversity credit prices
Credit tierPrice per credit
A1£42,000
A2£48,000
A3£66,000
A4£125,000
A5£650,000
Hedgerow£44,000
Watercourse£230,000

As published on the GOV.UK page updated 2 June 2026, with no change announced. Prices are reviewed every 6 months with at least 10 weeks' notice: check them on the day of purchase.

The voice that guides you through the pack

Ask, and the page takes you there.

A voice assistant always within reach, bottom right. Ask it about a section of the pack, the 10 per cent objective or who does what: it answers and brings the page to the right point.

  • It answers about this page: statutory Biodiversity Net Gain in England, the path to the gain plan, what each section of the pack shows.
  • It walks you through the document: it scrolls to the section and highlights it while you keep talking.
  • If you want a first analysis of your site on the platform, it prepares it, and you open it on XNatura after signing in.
Try the voice

You can ask, for example

  • Take me to the exemption check
  • What does the metric take for each parcel?
  • Who calculates the biodiversity units?
  • What are statutory credits?
  • I'd like a first analysis of my site on the platform

Contact

A planning application in England to prepare?

Tell us about the site, the development and your timing. A named strategist replies within 24 working hours.

30 minutes with the XNatura team

Video call on Google Meet

Would you rather talk it through?

Either way you are speaking with an AI assistant, and the conversation is transcribed. How we handle your data

Tell us about the site

Request sent.

One of our strategists replies within 24 working hours. If you need us sooner, write to info@3bee.com.

Use your company address: requests from a personal email are handled at info@3bee.com.

Sites, sector, standard or deadline: whatever you have.

A reply within 24 hours from a named strategist.

* required fields

FAQ

Frequently asked questions on Biodiversity Net Gain

What is mandatory Biodiversity Net Gain?

In England, Schedule 7A to the Town and Country Planning Act 1990, inserted by the Environment Act 2021, asks a development to deliver a biodiversity value at least 10 per cent above the pre-development value of the on-site habitat, measured at the relevant date (paragraphs 2 and 5). It applies to planning applications made from 12 February 2024 for major development and from 2 April 2024 for small sites; nationally significant infrastructure projects follow separate rules and guidance from 2 November 2026.

Which developments are exempt?

Householder applications; de minimis impacts, under 25 m² of on-site habitat or 5 m of linear habitat; and, for applications made from 6 August 2026, sites of 0.2 hectares or below and wholly temporary development permitted for 5 years or less. Those last three do not apply where priority habitat on site is impacted, and the self-build and custom build exemption no longer applies to applications made on or after 6 August 2026.

Do you calculate the biodiversity units?

No. Biodiversity units are calculated with the statutory biodiversity metric tool (Rule 3 of the user guide), by a competent person such as an ecologist, who surveys the site with the UK Habitat Classification and assesses condition with the metric's condition sheets. We prepare the desk baseline and the inputs: red line, candidate parcels and their sizes, protected sites, priority habitat screening, the score tables, and then the monitoring evidence. The local planning authority approves the biodiversity gain plan.

Does the 10 per cent apply to each type of unit?

Yes. Area habitat, hedgerow and watercourse units each need their own net gain of at least 10 per cent, and they must not be summed, traded or converted between types (Rule 2): one overall percentage is not enough. Within a module, the trading rules set minimum replacements by distinctiveness, up to the point of no net loss (Rule 1).

What if the gain cannot be delivered on site?

On-site comes first, then off-site units recorded on the biodiversity gain sites register run by Natural England (a legal agreement securing the land for 30 years, a registration fee of £639), and statutory credits only as a last resort: 2 credits for each unit missing, at prices from £42,000 (A1) to £650,000 (A5) per credit, reviewed every 6 months. From 6 August 2026 small, non-exempt developments may consider on-site and off-site gains at the same time.

Who approves the biodiversity gain plan, and how long does it take?

The local planning authority, which must approve or refuse it within 8 weeks; development cannot begin before approval (Schedule 7A, paragraphs 13 to 15). For nationally significant infrastructure projects the approving authority is the Secretary of State. The habitats created or enhanced are then maintained for at least 30 years from completion, under a habitat management and monitoring plan.

Is the project on this page real?

The pack is real in its form: generated with the platform from a template for the statutory metric, on a real study site at Chippenham, Cambridgeshire. The development is simulated: no developer, no client, no planning application, no survey, no metric submitted, and no biodiversity units, which only the statutory tool calculates.

Talk to the voice assistant
Next · XN EcologyCase studies

Try XNatura on your site

Choose how you prefer. With a new account the first demo is free.